Tax status – Sound Effects Online http://sound-effects-online.com/ Tue, 02 Nov 2021 18:13:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://sound-effects-online.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/favicon-4-120x120.png Tax status – Sound Effects Online http://sound-effects-online.com/ 32 32 Update on Tax Status – Cryptocurrency in the spotlight with the Senate Committee – Taxation https://sound-effects-online.com/update-on-tax-status-cryptocurrency-in-the-spotlight-with-the-senate-committee-taxation-2/ https://sound-effects-online.com/update-on-tax-status-cryptocurrency-in-the-spotlight-with-the-senate-committee-taxation-2/#respond Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:43:41 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/update-on-tax-status-cryptocurrency-in-the-spotlight-with-the-senate-committee-taxation-2/ To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com. Cryptocurrency (“Crypto“), a digital asset in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of additional units and verify transactions on a blockchain, is not a new concept. It has been more than a decade since the first decentralized crypto was released as bitcoin […]]]>

To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com.

Cryptocurrency (“Crypto“), a digital asset in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of additional units and verify transactions on a blockchain, is not a new concept. It has been more than a decade since the first decentralized crypto was released as bitcoin Yet crypto remains an elusive concept that is alien to many – despite the fact that 25% of Australians have ever owned or currently hold Crypto, making Australia one of the largest per capita users of this digital currency which has a global market totaling billions of dollars.1

The Australian tax office (“ATO“) also acknowledged that there is a widespread misunderstanding regarding the tax implications of investing in crypto, particularly among retail investors.2

It is against this background that the Australian Senate Select Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center (“Senate committee“) looked at crypto and regulatory reform. The Senate committee acknowledged that while other countries have moved forward in their attempts to create regulatory frameworks to provide participants with certainty and consumer protection, the Australia has yet to put in place a regulatory system suitable for this new technology sector. 3

Senate Committee Final Report

On October 20, 2021, the Senate Committee tabled its third and final report to Parliament (“Final report“), which sets out 12 reform recommendations, including a recommendation on taxation.

In this article, we take a look at the Senate Committee’s tax recommendation and the current Australian Crypto tax landscape.

Senate Committee tax recommendation

The Senate Committee recommended that the capital gains tax (“CGT“) be amended so that transactions in digital assets only create a CGT event when they actually result in a clearly definable gain or loss.4 This may require the creation of a new class of CGT assets or events allowing the application of specific concessions or exemptions.5

The Senate committee also indicated that the Treasury and the ATO may need to work proactively with industry to develop relevant changes and provide clarification to industry, including ensuring that guidance from the ATO are updated at least every six months to keep pace with new technological developments.6

Current crypto fiscal landscape

In order to appreciate the Senate committee’s tax recommendation, it is necessary to examine the current Australian crypto tax landscape. We provide a high level overview below:

  • The ATO’s view since 2014 is that crypto is not a “foreign currency” for income tax purposes, as it is not a legally recognized currency and adopted under the laws of Canada. ‘a country as a monetary unit and a means of fulfilling monetary obligations for transactions and payments. However, the question arises as to whether this view can be sustained as Crypto continues its meteoric rise and use at a speed that the Senate committee said has surprised governments, regulators and policymakers.7
  • The ATO’s view is that Crypto is a CGT asset, noting that a CGT asset is defined to include any type of property or legal or fair right that is not a property.8
  • As Crypto is a CGT asset, a taxpayer who owns Crypto in equity may be subject to income tax if a CGT event occurs and a capital gain occurs. This can happen in any of the following circumstances:
    • sell or offer Crypto;
    • trading or exchanging Crypto (including the transfer of Crypto for another Crypto);
    • convert Crypto to fiat currency (i.e. a government issued currency such as the Australian dollar); Where
    • use Crypto to obtain goods or services. 9
  • In the event of a capital gain, the taxable capital gain may be reduced by the CGT discount of 50%. If a capital loss occurs, it can be used to offset future gains.
  • Crypto that is held or used primarily to purchase goods and services for personal use (e.g. clothing, food, or pay personal bills) may not be subject to CGT on the basis of the ‘exemption of assets. for personal use ”.ten
  • If a taxpayer holds Crypto in an income account – which can happen if he regularly trades Crypto or operates a business that trades in Crypto – any gain from Crypto is taxable as ordinary income.11 The 50% CGT discount does not apply to reduce the win.

The ATO monitors whether taxpayers correctly report Crypto gains and losses through a data matching program to collect Crypto transaction details from Australia-based Crypto exchanges and through the use of AUSTRAC.12 and IFTI13 reports to detect cash inflows and outflows.

When Can Crypto’s Tax Treatment Become Uncertain?

Crypto’s current tax treatment is based on existing tax laws, including CGT provisions which are now over 30 years old. The interaction of these existing tax laws with new technology in Crypto can lead to a certain degree of “incompatibility” in crypto-to-crypto transactions. It cannot be assumed that Crypto is identical to traditional assets, such as real estate and stocks.

An example of where this can happen is where a coin or token interacts with a protocol and the crypto is burned, staked, or traded. This may result in a CGT event, even though the interaction is a feature of the technology and does not give rise to a gain or an interest in the asset. The consequence is that the user who tries to interact with the protocol in order to benefit from the public service can not only trigger a CGT event, but also reset the acquisition date of the CGT asset for the purpose of determining eligibility to the CGT of 50%. reduction.14

Other examples mentioned in the final report include:

  • an exchange of coins or tokens due to an upgrade or replacement of the underlying blockchain, for example when a digital token is replaced by another at a predetermined rate, and the original token is discarded rather than exchanged;
  • using a crypto (eg bitcoin or ether) to purchase a non-fungible token (NFT);
  • packaging of coins or tokens, i.e. wETH and ETH; and
  • deposit or lend Crypto to an interest-bearing account.

One possible solution is to remove the CGT tax point for crypto-to-crypto transactions, so CGT should only be applied when digital assets are exchanged for fiat currency or similar currency. The Senate committee said this could dramatically simplify the CGT rules, but warned that it could lead to tax revenue leakage in cases where large crypto-to-crypto transactions occur in a way that clearly generates a capital advantage. definable.15

What Can You Do If You Have Crypto?

The final report presents a recommendation for tax reform of CGT provisions for the purpose of dealing with crypto, in particular crypto-to-crypto transactions. It also highlights the challenge for the ATO to provide regular and current advice to keep pace with new Crypto technology developments. However, until a new tax reform is implemented, existing tax laws apply.

Taxpayers holding Crypto should be careful in considering relevant tax implications, including correctly reporting Crypto-derived gains, keeping in mind that the ATO uses data matching to monitor tax compliance and is aware widespread misunderstanding over the tax treatment of Crypto.

Taxpayers cannot simply assume that any gain derived from Crypto is not taxable income (especially in the simpler cases of buying, holding and selling the same Crypto for a substantial gain) and that the transaction will not will not be detected by the ATO.

It will also be prudent to keep records to support the tax position, as with any acquisition and disposal of shares or real estate.

In more complex cases, the question arises as to whether it would be useful to obtain a binding private decision from the ATO to confirm the tax treatment.

Footnotes

1 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page ix.

2 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page 64.

3 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page ix.

4 Recommendation 6 in the final report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021.

5 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page 140.

6 Same.

7 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page ix.

8 See TD 2014/26 Tax Determination.

9 ATO, “Transacting with Cryptocurrency” (last consulted on October 27, 2021) https://www.ato.gov.au/general/gen/tax-treatment-of-crypto-currencies-in-australia—specifically-bitcoin/?anchor=Transactingwithcryptocurrency

ten Same.

11 Same.

12 Australian Center for Transaction Analysis and Reporting.

13 International funds transfer instruction.

14 This is taken from FinTech Australia’s submissions to the Senate committee. Currently, the ATO has issued guidelines on crypto staking and argues that rewards received from staking can be assessed as ordinary income. ATO, “Transacting with Cryptocurrency” (last consulted on October 27, 2021) https://www.ato.gov.au/general/gen/tax-treatment-of-crypto-currencies-in-australia—specifically-bitcoin/?anchor=Transactingwithcryptocurrency

15 Final Report, The Senate – Special Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Center, October 2021 at page 140.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/update-on-tax-status-cryptocurrency-in-the-spotlight-with-the-senate-committee-taxation-2/feed/ 0
Bermuda Tax Status Reduction for Re / Insurance Industry: Fitch https://sound-effects-online.com/bermuda-tax-status-reduction-for-re-insurance-industry-fitch/ https://sound-effects-online.com/bermuda-tax-status-reduction-for-re-insurance-industry-fitch/#respond Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:12:31 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/bermuda-tax-status-reduction-for-re-insurance-industry-fitch/ Bermuda’s tax status for the insurance and reinsurance industry will be lowered following the expected adoption of the multilateral agreement to establish a global minimum tax rate of 15%, reports Fitch Ratings. Historically, Bermuda-based reinsurers have benefited from a low effective tax rate due to the lack of Bermuda corporation tax. The island was able […]]]>

Bermuda’s tax status for the insurance and reinsurance industry will be lowered following the expected adoption of the multilateral agreement to establish a global minimum tax rate of 15%, reports Fitch Ratings.

Historically, Bermuda-based reinsurers have benefited from a low effective tax rate due to the lack of Bermuda corporation tax.

The island was able to resist the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) which lowered the corporate tax rate in the United States from 35% to 21%, and developed the tax on erosion of the base and the anti-abuse tax (BEAT).

However, the TJCA reduced the tax advantage of Bermuda-incorporated businesses over the United States to a greater extent than expected with the adoption of a global minimum tax rate of 15%.

As Fitch explains: “The minimum tax rate of 15% will reduce the difference between the effective tax rate of non-Bermuda (re) insurers and Bermuda (re) insurers, although it is not not fully eliminated as most jurisdictions will have tax rates. above the minimum.

RMS

While island businesses have benefited from the absence of corporate taxes, Bermuda-based businesses pay taxes to other jurisdictions and also pay a US excise tax on state premium payments. – United with offshore subsidiaries.

“Bermuda companies have responded to the adoption of the TCJA with various strategic changes in the way they manage offshore operations to mitigate the overall negative impact of the tax change.

“Additionally, Bermuda-based business start-up and scale-up trainings continued, particularly in response to increasing underwriting opportunities in a tightening market environment. In addition, many Bermuda entities have filed for 953 (d) elections to be taxed as if it were a US corporation, in part because it eliminates the obligation to pay BEAT, ”continues Fitch.

In the near term, the rating agency does not anticipate any rating action on its universe of Bermuda re / insurers following the deal, but warns that the long-term implications are unknown.

“The overall benefits of maintaining a home and operating in the Bermuda market are likely to last, but the net profitability gap between companies incorporated in Bermuda and non-Bermuda is expected to narrow over time,” Fitch said.

User-friendly printing, PDF and email


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/bermuda-tax-status-reduction-for-re-insurance-industry-fitch/feed/ 0
Duffney hands over reins to council’s special tax status deal | Government meetings https://sound-effects-online.com/duffney-hands-over-reins-to-councils-special-tax-status-deal-government-meetings/ https://sound-effects-online.com/duffney-hands-over-reins-to-councils-special-tax-status-deal-government-meetings/#respond Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/duffney-hands-over-reins-to-councils-special-tax-status-deal-government-meetings/ Aitkin resident Scott Duffney approached Aitkin City Council at its September 22 regular meeting to request that the transfer of the tax increase financing deal his company has with the city be reassigned to the new owner. Council members approved the transfer. Duffney sold his business, Real Properties LLC, to Aitkin Real Assets LLC, a […]]]>

Aitkin resident Scott Duffney approached Aitkin City Council at its September 22 regular meeting to request that the transfer of the tax increase financing deal his company has with the city be reassigned to the new owner.

Council members approved the transfer.

Duffney sold his business, Real Properties LLC, to Aitkin Real Assets LLC, a company that has operated a facility in Fridley for 18 years.

Trevor Betley of Aitkin Title attended the meeting with Duffney and assisted with the title transfer.

Duffney said he enjoyed his business and had met and grown closer to many of its residents and their families.

“We have also lost some great people over the last year, and that tires you out,” he said.

Council members voted to approve resolution 2021-09-22A, adopting the preliminary budget 2022 as drafted.

The budget includes a 21.5% increase in the certified tax levy compared to the 2021 levy.

The proposed budget is based on forecasted revenues of $ 2,104,025 and total planned spending of $ 754,323.

There will be a final vote on the 2022 budget at the December 20 regular meeting of the Aitkin City Council.

The search for a new municipal administrator continued with the identification of a suitable pool of candidates.

On October 6 at 1 p.m., city council members and department heads will meet to interview three candidates for the vacant city administrator position.

A larger pool of applicants was selected by the company, but the finalists were selected by the board. Candidates have experience as city administrators in towns of a similar size to Aitkin.

Acting Streets Department Supervisor Lon Nicko provided some context for Bolton & Menk Change Order # 4 regarding work being done to replace the damaged concrete curb and gutter along First Street northeast.

“When the engineers started digging, they found elevations that weren’t correct and all kinds of artifacts and remnants of old sidewalks and other structures,” Nicko said. Amendment order 4 and payment request 4 relate to this work.

The amendment order and the payment request have been approved by the board.

STUDY ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF JOBS AND REMUNERATION OF THE CITY

Municipal government positions were the subject of a salary study conducted by David Drown and Associates.

DDA Representative Mark Goldberg presented the results of the study to the Board. Goldberg said DDA worked with

towns and counties in Minnesota for many years.

The goal of the study was to establish a class and pay system that made sense in the context of other cities in Minnesota.

Board members will review the proposed compensation structure and vote on whether to implement it and when the change is expected to take effect. This discussion and vote will take place at the regular council meeting on October 18.

• In recognition of her work for the Aitkin Town Police Department as Confidential Records Secretary, Amy Dotzler’s position has been upgraded from grade 5 to grade 6 and the new job description was approved unanimously by the members of the council.

A memorandum of understanding documenting the move has been approved, effective September 22.

• Mayor Megan Workman has issued a statement to the public and city employees saying that she values ​​the privacy of city employees in regards to their health care and will not impose any warrant on city employees.

• Dale Lueck was recognized as the League of Minnesota Cities Legislator of Distinction for 2021. Workman thanked Lueck for all he does for Aitkin and read the LMC letter aloud.

• The intersection of Ninth Avenue and First Street Northwest, which was an uncontrolled intersection, now has a new traffic sign. Nicko offered to take the stop sign on First Street and put a road sign on Eighth Avenue as well.

“Everything from Seventh Avenue west to First Street would be unrestricted and side streets would have signposts,” Nicko explained. “We try to keep the area uniform in order to make travel safer. ”

The other proposed addition / modification is on Fifth Avenue and First Street Northwest, where road signs have been placed on the Fifth Avenue side. Accidents always happen there, so the street service is offering to put a four-lane stop back in there.

“This is particularly worrying at dusk when there are football matches. Intersections have been painted and the parking lot set back from the intersection with no parking signs, ”Nicko said.

The Council voted to change the signs according to the proposal.

• Council member Jason Henke said the proposed security camera project for Aitkin City Park is aimed at ensuring the safety of people and property. Henke had concerns about the ‘Big Brother’ aspect of installing cameras, but recent vandalism and the upcoming construction of underfloor heating facilities make it a vital investment for the city.

“I just hope the citizens of Aitkin realize that the park is a valuable asset to our community, and if it continues to be vandalized, it won’t be what we want it to be.” future, ”said Board member Leeann Moriarty.

Henke proposed, with support from Kathy Galliger, to approve the park’s camera project, which is estimated to cost $ 6,890.

• There will no longer be a municipal dump for garden waste near the municipal garage on fourth avenue northwest.

Thursdays and Fridays from noon to 4 p.m., residents can dump their leaves and brush free of charge at the landfill south of Aitkin on the highway. 169.

“The free dumping of leaves and brush in town has led to fires in the past, which has caused this change,” Nicko said.

Information on the new procedure is on the county Web page.

The next regular meeting of the Aitkin City Council will be held on October 4 at 6 p.m. at the Aitkin Public Library.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/duffney-hands-over-reins-to-councils-special-tax-status-deal-government-meetings/feed/ 0
City and health care system continue to wrestle over property tax status https://sound-effects-online.com/city-and-health-care-system-continue-to-wrestle-over-property-tax-status/ https://sound-effects-online.com/city-and-health-care-system-continue-to-wrestle-over-property-tax-status/#respond Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/city-and-health-care-system-continue-to-wrestle-over-property-tax-status/ By Mike Warren MARSHFIELD – Marshfield officials are involved in another dispute with the city’s largest employer, over the property tax status of two of its plots. The Marshfield Clinic Health System is seeking tax-exempt status for its main building and its east wing at 1000 North Oak Avenue. The clinic made the request in […]]]>

By Mike Warren

MARSHFIELD – Marshfield officials are involved in another dispute with the city’s largest employer, over the property tax status of two of its plots.

The Marshfield Clinic Health System is seeking tax-exempt status for its main building and its east wing at 1000 North Oak Avenue. The clinic made the request in January, which the city refused in April. The clinic responded with litigation soon after, and the two sides have had ongoing deliberations since.

The Marshfield Common Council held closed-door discussions regarding the claim at its September 14-21 meetings.

“You’ll probably see this (on the agenda) a lot,” Marshfield City administrator Steve Barg told the Hub City Times on September 15. talk about a development agreement, you might see it one or two meetings, maybe three at most, before you go out and act.

The clinic claims that both facilities are primarily used for hospital purposes and therefore deserve the exemption granted to hospitals under Wisconsin law.

Marshfield Clinic executive vice president and general health system counsel Jerard Jensen told city aldermen at the Sept. 21 meeting that the east wing “is a hospital. It functions like a hospital. And, over the next few months, anything that is not for hospital use in this building will be converted to hospital use. “

“This is the first major element of our $ 600 million investment plan to upgrade our Marshfield campus to upgrade it, so it can operate here for another 100 years,” he said. he adds.

For the project to work, Jensen said Marshfield Medical Center – the former St. Joseph’s Hospital – would need a major makeover, “and we can’t do that without having a place to put the patients that we have to pull out to do the remodeling. “

Jensen also told the board: “The first step in this project is to link the old hospital to the new hospital (the east wing), so that we can efficiently move these patients back and forth.

However, the clinic’s plans for the new walkway met with an obstacle when the Aldermen of Marshfield voted 5-4 at their September 21 meeting against an order that would have granted the clinic a lease for the use of the airspace over Oak Avenue, which is necessary for such structures under the Wisconsin statutes.

The denial came two months after council voted on July 13 in favor of the lease form. The clinic’s two existing gateways on Kalsched Street and Oak Avenue connect the main building to the Laird Center for Medical Research and the East Wing, and both are licensed under similar leases.

As for the fight against the tax exemption, the city has hired the Stafford Rosenbaum law firm, and these expenses are covered by the city’s insurance company.

There are a lot of issues for the city. The main building and east wing of the Marshfield Clinic are currently valued at $ 112 million. That’s about 7% of the city’s $ 1.6 billion worth.

The issue would end up in the circuit court if no agreement is reached, according to Barg.

Both sides resolved earlier debates over tax exemption with a “PILOT” or “payment in lieu of taxes,” in which the clinic paid the city a predetermined amount of money instead of annual property taxes.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/city-and-health-care-system-continue-to-wrestle-over-property-tax-status/feed/ 0
Owners of historic Palatine garden center blame change in property tax status for closure https://sound-effects-online.com/owners-of-historic-palatine-garden-center-blame-change-in-property-tax-status-for-closure/ https://sound-effects-online.com/owners-of-historic-palatine-garden-center-blame-change-in-property-tax-status-for-closure/#respond Thu, 16 Sep 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/owners-of-historic-palatine-garden-center-blame-change-in-property-tax-status-for-closure/ A third-generation family business in Palatine is now vacant after its owners say a change in the way they are assessed for property taxes has bankrupted them. “We were meant to be here, I thought forever,” Ken Kinsch, former owner of Kinsch Florist and Garden Center, told ABC 7. The rubble is what remains of […]]]>

A third-generation family business in Palatine is now vacant after its owners say a change in the way they are assessed for property taxes has bankrupted them.

“We were meant to be here, I thought forever,” Ken Kinsch, former owner of Kinsch Florist and Garden Center, told ABC 7.

The rubble is what remains of the suburban greenhouse and flower farm after more than 80 years of operation. The company at 301 W. Johnson St. was opened in 1938 by brothers Ed and Leo Kinsch. The current generation of owners, including Ken Kinsch, can now only look around in disbelief.

“It’s very sad. It’s still what was meant to be in my family what your family is and we loved doing it. You know, I love people, my dad loved doing it with my family. ‘was a family tradition, “he said. noted. “We were the flower makers.”

They grew these flowers until recently. Their Cook County property tax bill in 2019 rose from just under $ 25,000 to $ 183,000, an increase of 640%. In 2020, they received another bill for $ 151,000.

After those big bills, the family decided they had to stop and close, hoping that if the land was found to be vacant it would eventually reduce the tax bills. Now five acres are empty and overgrown with weeds.

If they are classified as vacant, future tax bills could go down. But what is happening with these current invoices? The increase was due to the fact that the Cook County assessor changed all land from “farm” to “commercial”. Previously, only their small retail store was designated “commercial”.

• Read more about the ABC 7 Chicago story.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/owners-of-historic-palatine-garden-center-blame-change-in-property-tax-status-for-closure/feed/ 0
Compass Diversified Holdings changes its tax status. It is an opportunity for investors. https://sound-effects-online.com/compass-diversified-holdings-changes-its-tax-status-it-is-an-opportunity-for-investors/ https://sound-effects-online.com/compass-diversified-holdings-changes-its-tax-status-it-is-an-opportunity-for-investors/#respond Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/compass-diversified-holdings-changes-its-tax-status-it-is-an-opportunity-for-investors/ Text size Traders working on the New York Stock Exchange NYSE Compass Diversified Holdings shareholders approved a conversion of the company’s tax classification this month, a technical measure that is expected to simplify stock ownership, broaden its appeal to more investors, and reward stocks with a multiple of higher profits. Compass (symbol: CODI) looks like […]]]>

Text size


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/compass-diversified-holdings-changes-its-tax-status-it-is-an-opportunity-for-investors/feed/ 0
Senior Managers with Special Skills (HEPSS) Special Tax Status – Taxation https://sound-effects-online.com/senior-managers-with-special-skills-hepss-special-tax-status-taxation/ https://sound-effects-online.com/senior-managers-with-special-skills-hepss-special-tax-status-taxation/#respond Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/senior-managers-with-special-skills-hepss-special-tax-status-taxation/ Gibraltar: Senior Managers with Special Skills (HEPSS) Special Tax Status To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com. Gibraltar’s geographical position at the southern tip of the Iberian Peninsula, coupled with its favorable tax regime, makes this jurisdiction an attractive choice for senior executives with special skills (HEPSS) seeking to establish their residence […]]]>

Gibraltar: Senior Managers with Special Skills (HEPSS) Special Tax Status

To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com.

Gibraltar’s geographical position at the southern tip of the Iberian Peninsula, coupled with its favorable tax regime, makes this jurisdiction an attractive choice for senior executives with special skills (HEPSS) seeking to establish their residence here.

HEPSS status is a special employment status available to people who intend to settle in Gibraltar and take up employment.

A person for whom a HEPSS certificate is issued will need to earn a minimum amount of £ 160,000 in order to qualify for this allowance. They will pay tax on that amount and no more.

As a result of the new regulations, transitional provisions will apply to a natural person in respect of whom a certificate has been issued:

(1) which is valid and in force on July 31, 2021; and
(2) who earns between £ 120,000 and £ 160,000.

The natural person for whom this applies is taxable from August 1, 2021 on his taxable income until July 31, 2023 or the expiry of the certificate, at the earliest. In line with Gibraltar’s 2021 budget, this will allow employers not to lose an employee’s HEPSS certificate while they readjust their employee’s earnings and qualify under the revised provisions for HEPSS (i.e. earn over £ 160,000).

Download our full PDF for more information on the updated requirements and application process following the Gibraltar Budget Address 2021.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR POSTS ON: Gibraltar Tax

The 2021 Series Finance Law Part 1 – Taxation

AXIS Fiduciaire Ltd

The Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2021 was published on August 05, 2021 and it brings into force a number of amendments to Mauritian legislation.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/senior-managers-with-special-skills-hepss-special-tax-status-taxation/feed/ 0
Tlaib denounces tax status of entities supporting illegal settlements – Middle East Monitor https://sound-effects-online.com/tlaib-denounces-tax-status-of-entities-supporting-illegal-settlements-middle-east-monitor/ https://sound-effects-online.com/tlaib-denounces-tax-status-of-entities-supporting-illegal-settlements-middle-east-monitor/#respond Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/tlaib-denounces-tax-status-of-entities-supporting-illegal-settlements-middle-east-monitor/ US House Representative Rashida Tlaib caused a stir after pointing out on Twitter that illegal Israeli settlements currently enjoy tax-exempt status in America, a violation of international law. In an open letter, she called on U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to examine the legitimacy of the status of U.S.-based entities supporting settlements that perpetuate the […]]]>

US House Representative Rashida Tlaib caused a stir after pointing out on Twitter that illegal Israeli settlements currently enjoy tax-exempt status in America, a violation of international law. In an open letter, she called on U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to examine the legitimacy of the status of U.S.-based entities supporting settlements that perpetuate the forced displacement of Palestinians from their lands.

Tlaib is the first and only Palestinian American member of the United States Congress. Throughout her tenure as a congressman, she consistently spoke about Israel’s racist policies and human rights violations against Palestinians.

This “501 (c) (3)” status refers to the section of the US Internal Revenue Code that allows federal tax exemption for nonprofit organizations, especially public charities, private foundations or private foundations in operation. Tlaib’s letter expressed concerns that US charities are financially supporting illegal Israeli organizations.

“Since Israeli forces occupied the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, in 1967,” she wrote, “Israeli authorities have carried out an illegal settlement enterprise in occupied territory – a policy aggressive seizure of land either privately or collectively. used by Palestinians, and allocating them for the use and enjoyment of Jewish Israelis. “

She underlined the impact that such funding has had on the Palestinians. “The Israeli authorities use discriminatory housing, land and property legal regimes and impermissible military justifications to dispossess Palestinians of their land, or destroy Palestinian homes, property and critical civilian infrastructure. “

READ: US lawmakers submit bill to prevent Israel from using taxpayer money to target children

The letter also underscored the US government’s obligation to recognize and work to eliminate illegality and violations of international law. “The government… has a duty not to encourage or recognize violations of international humanitarian law… and must also act to end violations of international humanitarian law.

Several Twitter users questioned the member’s relevance in the matter:

However, the representative of the United States made it clear the reason for her intervention in her letter. “The Israel Central Fund (CFI), a US-based 501 (c) (3) entity registered in New York State, is one of several US-based groups that fuel the dispossession and displacement of Palestinians to make way for Jewish Israeli settlers. The group’s tax-exempt nonprofit status means that its donors receive some valuable form of support from the U.S. government in their efforts to support the settlement movement. “

His supporters hit back at those who condemn his focus on the issue:

Ali Abunimah, the director of electronicintifada.net, a Chicago-based publication covering Israel and Palestine, also responded to the thread highlighting the crucial U.S. position:

Tlaib pointed out that CFI has distributed at least $ 75 million in donations since 2015 to support illegal Israeli settlements. “[This illegal enterprise includes] international crimes such as forcible transfer, illegal appropriation and destruction of property, and Israel’s discriminatory military and housing, land and property legal regimes, among other violations.

While some Twitter users have expressed support for Tlaib, pro-Israel account holders have taken a less sympathetic approach:

The representative’s post comes two months after the occupation state bombed Gaza for 11 days, which left 250 Palestinians dead, including 65 children. The bombing followed protests in occupied Jerusalem as Palestinians anticipated the decision of the Israeli Supreme Court to evict four Palestinian families from the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood.

READ: Palestinians in Chicago overthrow extremist pro-Israel candidate in election



Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/tlaib-denounces-tax-status-of-entities-supporting-illegal-settlements-middle-east-monitor/feed/ 0
The HMRC questioned on the CEST while the tax status of 210,000 entrepreneurs remains “undetermined” https://sound-effects-online.com/the-hmrc-questioned-on-the-cest-while-the-tax-status-of-210000-entrepreneurs-remains-undetermined/ https://sound-effects-online.com/the-hmrc-questioned-on-the-cest-while-the-tax-status-of-210000-entrepreneurs-remains-undetermined/#respond Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/the-hmrc-questioned-on-the-cest-while-the-tax-status-of-210000-entrepreneurs-remains-undetermined/ HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has been called upon to explain why its online IR35 status checker remains unable to decide how hundreds of thousands of contractors should be taxed, months after the rollout of IR35 reforms in the private sector . The HMRC Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is designed for use […]]]>

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has been called upon to explain why its online IR35 status checker remains unable to decide how hundreds of thousands of contractors should be taxed, months after the rollout of IR35 reforms in the private sector .

The HMRC Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is designed for use by end user organizations who need to individually assess the IR35 status of the entrepreneurs they hire by asking a series of questions about their work habits and behaviours.

According to data released by HMRC earlier in June, in an 18-month period from November 2019, the tool failed to determine how contractors should be taxed in over 210,000 cases.

Based on the responses entered by the end user organization, the tool should generate a result that confirms whether the contractor should be taxed in the same way as a permanent employee (inside IR35) or as a self-employed person (outside IR35).

The tool has come under repeated criticism since tax collection made it available to entrepreneurs and end-user organizations before the roll-out of the IR35 public sector reforms in April 2017, with complaints suggesting that the tool is “error-prone” and “unsuitable for use”.

In November 2019, it emerged that NHS Digital had received a £ 4.3million IR35-related tax bill after using the CEST to assess its subcontractors, with reports also suggesting at that time that the The tool did not have the functionalities necessary to accurately assess the tax status of subcontractors. .

HMRC has always strongly defended the tool against all criticism and has repeatedly stated that it supports “every result it gives” provided the data entered into the tool is accurate and within its guidelines.

A revised version of the tool was released in November 2019, and HMRC released data on June 24, 2021 which confirmed that CEST was used a total of 1,653,672 times between the release of the reworked version and May 31, 2021.

Unsurprisingly, the data shows that CEST use began to ramp up ahead of the initial April 2020 rollout date of the IR35 reforms in the private sector, with 233,748 and 229,177 use cases in February 2020 and March 2020, respectively.

The onset of the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic prompted the UK government to delay the start of IR35 reforms in the private sector by 12 months, leading to a peak in CEST use in March 2021 with 233,133 organizations using it.

The data can also be deepened to highlight instances where CEST users have included entrepreneurs who provide their services through their own limited companies, known as intermediaries.

These data show that 1,018,250 workers identified as providing services through an intermediary used CEST between November 25, 2019 and May 31, 2021, and in about half of these cases (499,974) their commitments were classified as being out. IR35. Additionally, 308,176 were classified as being inside IR35, and the remaining 210,100 were labeled “undetermined”.

This echoes a trend highlighted six months ago when HMRC released a similar set of CEST-generated outcome data that showed it had failed to generate a definitive answer in nearly d ‘one in five.

Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 compliance firm Qdos, said that the fact that CEST remains unable to make a decision in more than 210,000 cases is concerning.

“I am surprised that the government still maintains an IR35 tool that could not be decided more than 210,000 times. Here we have proof that CEST has left hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs and businesses in limbo, unsure whether a contract belongs inside or outside IR35. It should be the last nail in the coffin of this fundamentally flawed tool, ”Maley said.

“I am curious to know what happened to these commitments. Does HMRC have the resources – let alone the expertise – to offer support on this scale? I doubt. The sheer number of indeterminate results leads to confusion, delays and, in many cases, non-compliance. “

On this point, HMRC has deployed a number of ancillary services to support CEST in recent months to support organizations struggling with the start of IR35 private sector reforms.

These include the introduction of direct online chat support when using CEST, as well as a dedicated helpline that users can use to get help with specific issues while using CEST. the use of the tool.

Commenting on the same data from HMRC, Dave Chaplin, CEO of contracting authority ContractorCalculator, said it’s important to remember that figures released by HMRC will include instances where people have experimented with the tool multiple times, and therefore should not be interpreted as “actual determinations of individual commitments”.

Even so, there are still many issues with the operation of CEST that still need to be resolved, he added: “The tool is not aligned with case law, omits reciprocity of obligations and puts too much emphasis on ’emphasis on the right of substitution, which will strongly skew the data towards more external determinations – which may not be supported by evidence or be defensible in a tax court.

“It’s interesting that in 20% of cases he can’t give an answer – we haven’t yet seen any advisers or judges just shrug their shoulders 1 in 5 times. We have to remember that the lawyer de HMRC argued in a preliminary tax court that the CEST was irrelevant. We suggest that people pay attention to the comments of their own lawyer, ”added Chaplin.

Computer Weekly forwarded Maley and Chaplin’s comments to HMRC and received the following statement from a spokesperson for the department: “In the vast majority of cases, the free CEST tool will determine the worker’s employment status for workers. taxes and national insurance contributions. In the minority of more finely balanced cases, the CEST will give an indeterminate result.

“To get a view in all cases, HMRC would have to add more complex questions, which would increase the load of using the tool for the majority of users,” the spokesperson said.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/the-hmrc-questioned-on-the-cest-while-the-tax-status-of-210000-entrepreneurs-remains-undetermined/feed/ 0
OECD Downgrades Filipino Regional Headquarters ‘Prejudicial’ Tax Status https://sound-effects-online.com/oecd-downgrades-filipino-regional-headquarters-prejudicial-tax-status/ https://sound-effects-online.com/oecd-downgrades-filipino-regional-headquarters-prejudicial-tax-status/#respond Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://sound-effects-online.com/oecd-downgrades-filipino-regional-headquarters-prejudicial-tax-status/ MANILA, Philippines – The Philippines has avoided being flagged as a “harmful” tax economy by a global policy forum for enacting a law that eliminates preferential rates on regional operating headquarters (ROHQ). The Department of Finance (DOF) said yesterday that the Philippines would be removed from the list of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development […]]]>

MANILA, Philippines – The Philippines has avoided being flagged as a “harmful” tax economy by a global policy forum for enacting a law that eliminates preferential rates on regional operating headquarters (ROHQ).

The Department of Finance (DOF) said yesterday that the Philippines would be removed from the list of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies that extend reduced taxes to ROHQs.

The OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) granted the DOF’s request to modify the country’s ROHQ assessment to reflect the changes made to the tax system through the adoption of the CREATE (Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises).

Deputy Finance Secretary Antonette Tionko said the ROHQ regime would now be labeled as “potentially harmful but not really harmful” until December 31 and declared “abolished” on January 1 of next year.

The FHTP considers the granting of preferential taxes to ROHQs as a characteristic “harmful” to the tax structure of any economy. In such a configuration, tax advantages are granted to foreign companies, which the FHTP considers disadvantageous for local investors.

In a report published in November last year, the FHTP estimated that the Philippine ROHQ regime was “being eliminated” and “potentially dangerous characteristics will be addressed.”

The FHTP planned to give the country a ROHQ rating of “harmful” until December 31, but the DOF requested that this rating be adjusted to take into account the reforms of the CREATE law.

The law lifts the special corporate income tax (IS) rate of 10% extended to ROHQs, forcing them to pay from next year the 25% corporate income tax rate imposed on domestic companies.

Tionko also informed the FHTP that the government was banning acquired rights in the CREATE law. If grandfathering were allowed, ROHQs would be allowed to retain their tax incentives for a number of years before moving to the new legislated tax structure.

He told the FHTP that the number of foreign investors availing themselves of the ROHQ incentives had declined since legislative discussions began on removing tax incentives in 2018. Based on data from the Bureau of Internal Revenue, only one company has requested ROHQ benefits in 2019..

In March, President Duterte signed the CREATE law that lowers the CIT rate to 25%, from 30% – the highest among Southeast Asian countries – in an attempt to encourage companies to improve their local operations.

The measure, however, removed incentives like the five percent gross income tax paid in lieu of local and state taxes enjoyed by exporters in economic zones.


Source link

]]>
https://sound-effects-online.com/oecd-downgrades-filipino-regional-headquarters-prejudicial-tax-status/feed/ 0